MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326465737 · doi:10.1071/aseg2004ab162

The geotech VTEM time domain helicopter em system

2004· article· pt· W2326465737 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ken Witherly, Richard Irvine, Edward Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueASEG Extended Abstracts · 2004
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsPetro Geotech (Canada)Condor Petroleum (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Time domainEngineeringDomain (mathematical analysis)Bridge (graph theory)Range (aeronautics)Systems engineeringComputer scienceGeographyAerospace engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Geotech Ltd. VTEM heli-time domain EM system entered into commercial service in late 2002 after a development program that started in early 2001. Since then, the system has performed surveys in Canada, the USA, Brazil and southern Africa for a range of mineral deposit styles in a variety of geological settings.The VTEM system bears similarity to many of the past and currently operating heli-time domain system designs but has focused more than other developments on operational simplicity and flexibility in how the system is configured. A very high dipole (coupled with very low system noise levels) is deemed a major differentiating factor of the system compared with others in current operation.In terms of applications, VTEM is seen as an effective bridge between existing airborne electromagnetics technologies, combining the high spatial resolution associated with helicopter systems but with a depth of investigation similar to what fixed wing time domain systems were traditionally required to achieve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueASEG Extended AbstractsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207