MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326499892 · doi:10.1109/tec.2016.2539959

A New Stray-Load Loss Formula for Small and Medium-Sized Induction Motors

2016· article· en· W2326499892 on OpenAlexafffund
Pragasen Pillay, Maher Al-Badri, Pierre Angers, Chirag Desai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHydro-Québec
KeywordsInduction motorHorsepowerRange (aeronautics)EngineeringElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringElectrical engineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a new stray-load loss (SLL) formula for small and medium induction motors (IMs) based on tests data of a 182, 60 Hz IMs in the range of 1-500 hp (0.75-375 kW). They are all tested in accordance with IEEE Std 112-Method B. The proposed formula is validated by recalculating the efficiency of the same number of motors by using the proposed formula, as well as the IEEE Std 112 and the IEC 60034-2-1 standards. Another validation was done on testing 17 additional IMs that are independent of the 182-motor data. In both validations, the new formula demonstrates better accuracy. This formula shows the potential to replace the existing SLL estimation formula for this horsepower range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Energy ConversionSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207