MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326570567 · doi:10.3749/canmin.50.1.55

KOTTENHEIMITE, Ca3Si(OH)6(SO4)2{middle dot}12H2O, A NEW MEMBER OF THE ETTRINGITE GROUP FROM THE EIFEL AREA, GERMANY

2012· article· en· W2326570567 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Nikita V. Chukanov, Sergey N. Britvin, К. В. Ван, S. Möckel, A. E. Zadov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEttringiteGroup (periodic table)GeologyGeochemistryMineralogyMaterials scienceMetallurgyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The new ettringite-group mineral kottenheimite was found at Bellerberg, near Kottenheim, Eastern Eifel area, Rhineland- Palatinate (Rheinland-Pfalz), Germany, and named for the type locality. Associated minerals are wollastonite, clinochlore, ellestadite, melilite, cuspidine, and earlier formed sanidine, clinopyroxene, and magnetite. Kottenheimite forms white radiated and random aggregates of hair-like subparallel clusters of minute crystals. The Mohs’ hardness is 2–2.5; D meas = 1.92(2) g/cm 3 , D calc = 1.926 g/cm 3 . The new mineral is uniaxial (−), ω = 1.490(2), ɛ = 1.477(2). The IR spectrum of kottenheimite is in accordance with the chemical composition and contains absorption bands in the range 3300–3700 cm −1 (O–H-stretching vibrations), at 1650 and 1683 cm −1 (bending vibrations of H 2 O molecules), 1158, 1086, and 987 cm −1 (showing the presence of distorted SO 4 2− groups), 752 and 725 cm −1 (corresponding to Si–O stretching vibrations of Si(OH) 6 octahedra). The chemical composition is (electron microprobe, mean of 6 analyses, wt.%; H 2 O and CO 2 determined by gas chromatography): CaO 26.04, MgO 0.20, FeO 0.19, Al 2 O 3 0.25, SiO 2 8.95, SO 3 24.26, CO 2 0.58, H 2 O 41.30; total 101.77. The empirical formula calculated on the basis of 26 anions is Ca 3.015 Mg 0.03 Fe 0.02 Al 0.03 Si 0.97 (OH) 5.94 (SO 4 ) 1.97 (CO 3 ) 0.09 ·11.91H 2 O. The simplified formula is Ca 3 Si(OH) 6 (SO 4 ) 2 ·12H 2 O. The crystal structure was refined by the Rietveld method ( R p = 0.0487, R wp = 0.0623, R B = 0.087) based on the structural model of carraraite, Ca 3 Ge(SO 4 ,CO 3 ) 2 (OH) 6 ·12H 2 O. The new mineral is hexagonal, space group P 6 3 / m , a = 11.1548(3), c = 10.5702(3) A, V = 1139.04(5) A 3 , and Z = 2. The strongest lines of the powder diffraction pattern [ d in A ( I ) ( hkl )] are: 9.72 (100) (100), 5.590 (60) (110), 4.645 (26) (102), 3.840 (54) (112), 2.751 (34) (302), 2.536 (27) (213), 2.185 (30) (223). The channels in the crystal structure of kottenheimite are only filled by sulfate anions and water molecules. Type material is deposited in the collections of the Fersman Mineralogical Museum of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, registration number 4102/1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207