MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326581274 · doi:10.3406/outre.2006.4203

Un projet colonial français au Paraguay : Henri de Liniers et son plan de colonisation du Rio de La Plata au début du XIXe siècle

2006· article· fr· W2326581274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOutre-mers · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArgentine historical studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lorsque la France de la Révolution retrouva toute sa force en Europe, des voix s'élevèrent pour encourager la reprise des colonies perdues comme le Canada ou la Louisiane. A l'époque du Consulat et de la paix d'Amiens, Bonaparte lança de très larges projets coloniaux en Amérique comme en Asie. L'Espagne paraissait incapable de tenir son immense domaine. Beaucoup de Français conseillèrent au gouvernement républicain de prendre en main la direction de certaines parties importantes de l'empire espagnol pour anticiper une action éventuelle de l'Angleterre. C'est ainsi qu'en 1803, Henri de Liniers envoya un Mémoire à Bonaparte pour lui proposer une action coloniale à l'embouchure du Rio de La Plata qui faisait partie à ce moment-là du Paraguay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it