MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326603557 · doi:10.1524/zpch.218.8.929.35982

A Statistical Mechanical Model of Polymer Brushes: Equilibrium and Growth

2004· article· en· W2326603557 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Lucian Livadaru, Hans Juergen Kreuzer

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchKillam TrustsDalhousie University
KeywordsBrushPolymerPolymer brushChain (unit)GraftingMaterials scienceKinetic energyPolymer chemistryThermodynamicsChemical physicsChemistryPhysicsComposite materialClassical mechanicsPolymerization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We construct a statistical mechanical model for a polymer brush in θ-solvent. The model is exactly solvable for realistic polymer models (e.g. the freely rotating chain and the rotational isomeric state models) and it readily accounts for inhomogeneities of the brush with respect to the plane parallel to the grafting surface. The interactions between neighboring chains is mimicked by the presence of a confinement potential centered on the grafting point of each chain. We explore the model to calculate the equilibrium and kinetic properties of the polymer brush. We find that the variations of the brush free energy and height with the coverage depend strongly on the stiffness of the polymer chain (bond angle) and on the severity of the chain confinement. The results for the growth kinetics of the brush are compared with recent measurements on the formation of a PEG2000 brush from solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Physikalische ChemieSame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207