E67. Enhanced Closed Kinematic Chain Biomechanical Therapy for Patients after Total Knee Arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Many factors contribute to suboptimal results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Little is known regarding the value of post-surgical rehabilitation after TKA. We examined the effect of an enhanced closed kinematic chain exercises programme on gait patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with a lack of progress in their post-surgical rehabilitation. Methods: Twenty-two patients were prospectively followed during the study. Gait spatiotemporal parameters were measured at initial evaluation, after 15 min of therapy and at 3 months. Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires were filled in by patients before treatment and after 3 months of treatment. Results: WOMAC and SF-36 scores significantly improved after 3 months of treatment. Gait velocity, single limb support (SLS) and step length of the operated leg significantly improved even after a single 15-min treatment. Normal gait velocity appeared among 36% of patients after 3 months of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".