Monogynistic and Monogamous Tendencies, Memories and Imagination in Late Persian/Early Hellenistic Yehud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: This article explores monogynistic and monogamous tendencies, memories and imagination in late Persian/early Hellenistic Yehud that were evoked, encoded and represented as the community or at least its literati read and reread the texts in their central literary repertoire. It also sets these tendencies within larger contexts, in terms both of a regional oikoumene and of general anthropological considerations. Résumé: Cette étude est consacrée aux tendances, souvenirs et représentations monogyniques et monogamiques à l’époque Yéhud, c-à-d. à la période perse tardive et au début de l’ère hellénistique, qui furent suscitées, figées et énoncées alors que la communauté – ou du moins ses spécialistes de l’écrit – lurent et relurent les textes du répertoire considérés par eux comme centraux. Cette étude situe également ces tendances dans un contexte plus large, aussi bien dans la perspective d’une oecumène régionale que dans le cadre de considérations anthropologiques plus larges. Zusammenfassung: Dieser Artikel befasst sich mit monogynistischen und monogamen Tendenzen, Erinnerungen und Vorstellungen im spätpersischen/frühhellenistischen Jehud, die wachgerufen, festgehalten und vertreten wurden, als die Gemeinschaft oder zumindest die Schriftkundigen die für sie zentralen Texte wieder und neu gelesen haben. Er stellt die Tendenzen dieses literarischen Repertoires in einen größeren Zusammenhang, sowohl im Blick auf eine regionale Ökumene als auch hinsichtlich allgemeiner anthropologischer Überlegungen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".