MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326672233 · doi:10.1177/1743872113483093

“Your girls that you all love are mine already”: <i>Dracula</i> , Mormonism and New Women’s Degenerate Polygamy

2013· article· en· W2326672233 on OpenAlexaff
Jenny Roth, Lori Chambers, Dana M. Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueLaw Culture and the Humanities · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMormonism, Religion, and History
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDraculaVampireEmpirePopular cultureRelation (database)Power (physics)LawSociologyHistoryGender studiesLiteratureArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polygamy, often unmentioned or glossed over by critics, is central to Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897). Representations of law in relation to the polygamy threat borne by vampires connect the novel to contemporary legal and popular debates about the perceived threat Mormonism posed to patriarchal power within empire and home. Stoker’s treatment of polygamy places the novel within the contemporary contextual canon of anti-polygamy and anti-Mormon novels, thus situating it as a popular participant in the legal debates about polygamy, empire and women’s rights which took place in the fin-de-siécle courts and popular press on both sides of the Atlantic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLaw Culture and the HumanitiesSame topicMormonism, Religion, and HistoryFrench-language works237,207