MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Economic evaluation and the treatment of end-stage renal disease

2001· review· en· W2326737267 on OpenAlexaffabout
Braden Manns, Kenneth J. Taub, Cam Donaldson

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnd stage renal diseaseFoothillsPeritoneal dialysisContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisEnd stage renal failureInternal medicineDialysisIntensive care medicineGerontologyDiseaseGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

aDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, bDepartment of Community Health Sciences, and cDepartment of Economics, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Correspondence to Dr Braden Manns, Foothills Medical Center, 1403-29th Street NW, Calgary, AB, T2N-2T9 Canada. Tel: +1 403 670 2595; fax: +1 403 670 1234; e-mail: [email protected] Abbreviations CAPD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis ESRD: end-stage renal disease QALY: quality-adjusted life-year

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in Nephrology & HypertensionSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207