Visualization Configuration Model for Integrating Presentation of Construction Project Management Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Construction management tasks involve and produce voluminous, multidimensional data. Although many tasks currently are supported with software tools, it still requires great mental effort for project personnel to read information in datasets and analyze relationships from one dataset to another. Information visualization is widely considered to hold the potential of providing insights from datasets by visually presenting project management data and information relationships. Many visualization solutions are available to the construction domain, but they usually focus on specific application tasks, lacking flexibility and data integration in user-interaction for construction management. This paper proposes a Visualization Configuration Model (VCM), a novel visualization technique for construction project management. Integrated with the Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) data model, the VCM is developed to be a configurable visualization environment, facilitating user-interactions to explore voluminous information. The model framework and underlying theories for integrating model components are provided. Through analysis of two case scenarios, the paper demonstrates the capability of the VCM supporting view configuration and illustrates the potential of visualization to benefit construction management tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it