MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2326757243 · doi:10.1115/imece2015-50950

Fluid Structure Interaction for Nonlinear Response of Aorta Replacement

2015· article· en· W2326757243 on OpenAlexaff
Eleonora Tubaldi, Marco Amabili, Michael P. Paı̈doussis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulsatile flowMechanicsAortaNewtonian fluidIsotropyFluid–structure interactionBlood flowMaterials scienceFlow (mathematics)Thoracic aortaNonlinear systemBiomedical engineeringStructural engineeringPhysicsEngineeringSurgeryFinite element methodCardiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vascular prostheses used for repairing and replacing damaged and diseased the thoracic aorta in cases of aneurysm, dissection or coarctation have distinctly different mechanical properties than the native aorta. Very little is known about the dynamic behavior of vascular prostheses that can cause unwanted hemodynamic effects leading to their failure. In this study, a Dacron reconstitution of the aorta is modelled as an isotropic cylindrical shell by means of nonlinear Novozhilov shell theory. A numerical bifurcation analysis employs a refined reduced order model to investigate the dynamic behavior of a pressurized Dacron aortic replacement conveying blood flow. A pulsatile time-dependent blood flow model is considered in order to study the effect of pressurization by applying physiological waveforms of velocity and pressure during the heart beating period. Stresses due to pressurization are evaluated and included in the model. The fluid is modeled as a Newtonian pulsatile flow and it is formulated using a hybrid model that contains the unsteady effects obtained from the linear potential flow theory and the pulsatile viscous effects obtained from the unsteady time-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. Geometrically non-linear vibration response to pulsatile flow is here presented via frequency-response curves and time histories. This study provides a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction model and it allows deep insights in the mechanical loading condition of the aortic replacements; this insight has potential to aid in vascular prostheses design and implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→