MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326786232 · doi:10.1021/ie3005995

Free-Radical-Induced Degradation of Aqueous Polyethylene Oxide by UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>: Experimental Design, Reaction Mechanisms, and Kinetic Modeling

2012· article· en· W2326786232 on OpenAlexafffund
Samira Ghafoori, Mehrab Mehrvar, Philip K. Chan

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdvanced oxidation water treatment
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsResponse surface methodologyKineticsAqueous solutionPhotodegradationDegradation (telecommunications)Reaction rate constantProcess optimizationChemistryPolyethyleneProcess (computing)Sequential quadratic programmingMaterials scienceBiological systemQuadratic programmingChemical engineeringComputer scienceOrganic chemistryChromatographyCatalysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advanced oxidation of aqueous polyethylene oxide (PEO) is studied using the UV/H 2 O 2 process in a batch recirculation photoreactor. The response surface methodology (RSM), combined with quadratic programming, is used for the experimental design, statistical analysis, and optimization of the process. In the second part, a detailed mathematical model is developed to predict the total organic carbon (TOC) removal as a function of time. Continuous distribution kinetics is applied to establish the kinetic model for the photodegradation of PEO. The model is validated at different influential operating conditions using experimental data obtained by a recirculating batch photoreactor. An excellent agreement between the model predictions and the experimental data is confirmed for all experimental conditions. Also, the intrinsic rate constants are estimated using an optimization algorithm. The model provides a good insight into the free-radical-induced degradation mechanisms and kinetics that could be considered for the process optimization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAdvanced oxidation water treatmentFrench-language works237,207