MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326787716 · doi:10.1177/155989771201011

SPS3 Study Does Not Support the Use of Combination Therapy for Stroke Prevention

2012· article· en· W2326787716 on OpenAlexaff
R. Buckley, Oscar Benavente

Bibliographic record

VenueMD Conference Express · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStroke (engine)Lacunar strokeMedicineSecondary preventionCognitive impairmentCognitionIschemic strokePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyInternal medicinePsychiatryIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small subcortical strokes, also known as lacunar strokes, constitute more than 25% of brain infarcts and are the most common cause of vascular cognitive impairment. How to optimally prevent stroke recurrence and cognitive decline in patients with small subcortical stroke is unclear [Benevente OR et al. Int J Stroke 2011]. This article discusses results from The Secondary Prevention of Small Subcortical Strokes Study: The Antiplatelet Trial Results [SPS3; NCT00059306].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMD Conference ExpressSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207