MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Control of Femtosecond Laser Ablation of Thin Films from a Dielectric Surface by Nonlinear Interaction with the Substrate

2014· article· en· W2326814323 on OpenAlexaff
Laurent Mercadier, D. M. Rayner, P. B. Corkum

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsJoint Attosecond Science LaboratoryUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFilamentationAblationFemtosecondLaserLaser ablationReproducibilityDielectricThin filmOptoelectronicsSubstrate (aquarium)OpticsNanolithographyNanotechnologyFabricationPhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Laser ablation is potentially important for nanofabrication but can suffer from poor reproducibility, as it is highly sensitive to even small fluctuations in the laser energy. The authors exploit nonlinear effects in the propagation of high-intensity light through transparent media to control ablation of ultrathin (8 nm) polymer films, achieving subwavelength resolution and a tolerance to energy fluctuations that allows high reproducibility. They also show conversely how thin-film laser ablation can be used to profile laser beams undergoing self-focusing and filamentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207