Induced spiral motion in cardiac tissue due to alternans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spiral wave meander is a typical feature observed in cardiac tissue and in excitable media in general. Here, we show for a simple model of excitable cardiac tissue that a transition to alternans--a beat-to-beat temporal alternation in the duration of cardiac excitation--can also induce a transition in the spiral core motion that is related to the presence of synchronization defect lines (SDLs) or nodal lines. While this is similar to what has been predicted and indeed observed for complex-oscillatory media close to onset, we find important qualitative differences. For example, single straight SDLs rotate and induce an additional nonresonant frequency characterizing the core motion of the attached spiral. We analyze this behavior quantitatively as a function of the steepness of the restitution curve and show that the velocity and the directionality of the core motion vary monotonically with the control parameter. Our findings agree with recent observations in rat heart tissue cultures indicating that the described behavior is of rather general nature. In particular, it could play an important role in the context of potentially life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias such as fibrillation for which alternans and spiral waves are known precursors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".