MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2326922896 · doi:10.1139/p11-111

Excited oxygen states in the Venus nightglow <sup>1</sup>This article is part of a Special Issue that honours the work of Dr. Donald M. Hunten FRSC who passed away in December 2010 after a very illustrious career.

2012· article· en· W2326922896 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
T. G. Slanger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsVenusPhysicsAirglowExcited stateDissociative recombinationPlanetPhotoexcitationAtomic physicsAtmosphere (unit)AstrobiologyAtmospheric escapeAstrophysicsRecombinationAstronomyMeteorologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the absence of solar radiation, the most common photoexcitation process in the terrestrial planets results from atom recombination. Thus, in the Mars and Venus atmospheres recombination of O(3P) + O(3P) and O(3P) + N(4S) leads to emissions of excited states of O2 and NO, respectively. However, in the Earth’s atmosphere there are ionospheric emissions that depend on interactions of charged species, for example, the oxygen red and green lines arising from dissociative recombination (DR) of [Formula: see text]. In the case of the CO2 planets, the predominant ionospheric ion is also [Formula: see text], so that in principle DR is important in that environment, where the markers would also be the red and green lines. Whether these can be detected depends on DR rates and the radiating efficiencies of these species. In this report we discuss the history of green line detection in the Venus nightglow as well as the observations of excited O2 molecules, and the lack of appearance of the O2 (b–X) Atmospheric 0–0 band.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate→French-language works237,207→