MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2326940620 · doi:10.1061/40990(324)17

Assimilating Hydrographic Observations into a Nested-Grid Coastal Circulation Model

2008· article· en· W2326940620 on OpenAlexaff
Li Zhai, Jinyu Sheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownwellingHydrographyUpwellingOcean currentClimatologyData assimilationOceanographyBayBathythermographGeologyOcean general circulation modelEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeneral Circulation ModelGeographyClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical scheme was developed for assimilating moored temperature and salinity observations into a coastal ocean circulation model. The main idea of this scheme is to restore the model temperature and salinity to pseudo-observations created from moored hydrographic observations using a pre-determined transfer function. The transfer function is defined as the correlation function between the model variables at each model grid point and the observation site. This assimilation scheme was implemented in a nested-grid coastal ocean circulation modeling system for Lunenburg Bay in Nova Scotia. The hydrographic observations at one of three moorings in Lunenburg Bay are assimilated into the model, and the observations at the other two sites are used to assess the performance of the scheme. In comparison with the unassimilated model results, the data-assimilative circulation model reproduces reasonably well the upwelling/downwelling events in the bay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.592

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→