MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2326965487 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-943659

SICKLE CELL CRISIS PRESENTING AS A NUMB CHIN SYNDROME IN A CHILD

2006· article· en· W2326965487 on OpenAlexaff
Myriam Srour, Sharon Abish, D. Mitchell, Chantal Poulin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinNUMBMedicinePresentation (obstetrics)Mandible (arthropod mouthpart)SkullAnatomySurgeryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Numb chin syndrome, also called mental neuropathy, is usually conceived of as a harbinger of malignancy of the skull. We describe an unusual presentation of a case of a numb chin syndrome in a child with sickle cell crisis involving her mandible. Methods: Case report. Results: The patient is 6 year-old girl with known sickle cell disease and auto-immune hepatitis of unclear etiology. She was seen by the neurology service for acute onset of a numb chin in context of a painful jaw. Examination revealed painful swelling at the level of the mandible bilaterally as well as sensory deficits in the distribution of the mental nerve, involving the lower lip and chin bilaterally. Taste and tongue sensation were preserved. MRI of the jaw showed a right temporal mandibular joint effusion and abnormal marrow signal suggestive of vascular necrosis. Symptoms completely resolved after one week with symptomatic treatment of the sickle cell crisis. This patient is now followed for a steroid myopathy. Conclusion: Sickle cell crisis should be included in the differential diagnosis of numb chin syndrome in children. Magnetic Resonance Imaging is useful in identifying the underlying etiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207