Book Reviews / Compte Rendus: Pathways to Inclusion: Building a New Story with People and Communities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With Pathways to Inclusion: Building a New Story with People and Communities, John Lord and Peggy Hutchison summarize over a quarter century of their experience, research, and thought on the ways to overcome the debilitating, demoralizing, and dehumanizing effects of marginalization and exclusion of people with disabilities or other vulnerabilities. Their interests lie in innovations that spring from collaborative community-based work involving people directly affected by social exclusion, and that aim to promote greater community participation and civic engagement. Much of this research and thought was produced at the Centre for Research and Education in Human Services in Kitchener Ontario (CREHS; recently renamed the Centre for Community-Based Research), cofounded by Lord, Hutchison, and others in 1982, and which Lord led for more than a decade. Their experiences, both personal and professional, have inspired what they characterize as a New Story "about possibilities, participation, and inclusion within a social justice framework" (p. xii).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".