Venlafaxine enhances the effect of bupropion on extracellular dopamine in rat frontal cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Venlafaxine is recognised as an effective treatment for depression and is known to inhibit the reuptake of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA). Another antidepressant, bupropion, acts to inhibit dopamine (DA) and NA reuptake and is commonly co-administered with other antidepressants to improve the efficacy of the antidepressant effect. The present study was designed to investigate the acute effect of combining the 2 drugs on extracellular levels of 5-HT, DA, and NA in rat frontal cortex using brain microdialysis, with the drugs being administered by intraperitoneal injection (i.p). Bupropion (10 mg/kg body mass, i.p.) alone had no effect on extracellular 5-HT levels, whereas venlafaxine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) alone significantly elevated extracellular 5-HT over basal values. As expected, bupropion alone elevated extracellular dopamine above basal values at 40 min post-drug administration, and this effect lasted for a further 2 h. Venlafaxine alone did not statistically elevate extracellular dopamine. The co-administration of venlafaxine with bupropion resulted in a dramatic increase in extracellular dopamine, and this effect was significantly greater than that seen with bupropion alone. In the frontal cortex, NA was elevated by bupropion alone and venlafaxine alone, relative to the control animals. The combination of bupropion and venlafaxine resulted in a marked elevation of NA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".