MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327061461 · doi:10.1515/jpem.2000.13.5.483

Expression of the Aromatase Gene in the Human Prepubertal Testis

2000· article· en· W2327061461 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nora Saraco, Esperanza Berensztein, Andrea Dardis, M A Rivarola, Alicia Belgorosky

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHormonal and reproductive studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsAromataseInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicinePeriod (music)Gene expressionGeneAndrogenMessenger RNAAndrologyBiologyHormoneCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been proposed that estrogens might play a negative feedback role in the local regulation of androgen biosynthesis in the testis. Although aromatase has been reported to be present in human adult Leydig cells, CYP19 gene expression in the human prepubertal testis has not been studied. Human prepubertal testicular tissue was obtained from 12 testes collected at necropsy. Ages ranged from 0.07 to 7 years, but 7 of the 12 subjects were younger than 3 months old. Tissue mRNA was subjected to RT-PCR analysis by two methods. Cytochrome P450arom mRNA was detected by non-radioactive RT-PCR in five of the 12 prepubertal testes collected from 0.05-7 year-old subjects, and in one testis collected from a 15 year-old pubertal control. Four of these five prepubertal samples belonged to the youngest infant group. Using a more sensitive, radioactive RT-PCR, aromatase mRNA was detected in all prepubertal testes. This study shows that the CYP19 gene is expressed in the prepubertal human testis including the period of early postnatal activation. It is possible that estrogens may have a role in prepubertal males during this period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicHormonal and reproductive studiesFrench-language works237,207