MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327107668 · doi:10.1061/40652(2003)4

Integrating Conceptual Structural Design with Early Architecture

2002· article· en· W2327107668 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceProcess (computing)InterdependenceRepresentation (politics)Structural systemEnterprise architecture frameworkSoftware engineeringSystems engineeringConceptual designSoftware architectureEngineeringHuman–computer interactionProgramming languageSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research project aims at assisting both the architect and the structural engineer in the spatial configuration of the structural system as an integral part of the evolving 3D architecture. It allows the engineer to take full advantage of the opportunities provided by the architecture, at different levels of refinement, by directly deriving structural schemes from the 3D model. It also allows the architect to receive more opportune and informed structural feedback, and to detect structural problems earlier in the process. At the core of this approach lies a design representation that describes relevant information to both disciplines in a uniform framework and reflects the strong interdependency between the architecture and the structural system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.799
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207