MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327107668 · doi:10.1061/40652(2003)4

Integrating Conceptual Structural Design with Early Architecture

2002· article· en· W2327107668 on OpenAlexaff
Rodrigo Mora, Hugues Rivard, Claude Bédard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture and Computational Design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceProcess (computing)InterdependenceRepresentation (politics)Structural systemEnterprise architecture frameworkSoftware engineeringSystems engineeringConceptual designSoftware architectureEngineeringHuman–computer interactionProgramming languageSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research project aims at assisting both the architect and the structural engineer in the spatial configuration of the structural system as an integral part of the evolving 3D architecture. It allows the engineer to take full advantage of the opportunities provided by the architecture, at different levels of refinement, by directly deriving structural schemes from the 3D model. It also allows the architect to receive more opportune and informed structural feedback, and to detect structural problems earlier in the process. At the core of this approach lies a design representation that describes relevant information to both disciplines in a uniform framework and reflects the strong interdependency between the architecture and the structural system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArchitecture and Computational DesignFrench-language works237,207