MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327143754 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2016.2541621

Damped High Passive Filter—A New Filtering Scheme for Multipulse Rectifier Systems

2016· article· en· W2327143754 on OpenAlexafffund
Xin Li, Wilsun Xu, Tianyu Ding

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHarmonicFilter (signal processing)Electronic engineeringElectronic filterActive filterFilter designElectrical impedancePrototype filterHarmonic analysisRectifier (neural networks)High-pass filterLow-pass filterControl theory (sociology)EngineeringComputer scienceAcousticsPhysicsElectrical engineeringVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multipulse rectifier systems are commonly used to reduce harmonic emission. However, they still require the installation of noncharacteristic harmonic filters to prevent harmful resonance between its high-pass filter and the system impedance. The advantage of a multipulse configuration-very low noncharacteristic harmonic emission-is, therefore, not fully utilized. In view of this shortcoming, a novel filter called the damped high-pass filter is proposed. The filter does not cause resonance at the noncharacteristic harmonic frequencies. As a result, traditional noncharacteristic 5th and 7th harmonic filters are no longer needed, resulting in significant cost and space savings for the multipulse systems. The core idea behind this filter is a frequency-dependent resistor block that provides high damping at the noncharacteristic harmonic frequencies. The design procedure for the proposed filter is presented. Performance and usefulness of the new filtering scheme has been demonstrated through comparative studies on two actual industry cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207