Modeling and Measurement of Contact Angle Hysteresis on Textured High-Contact-Angle Surfaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide A set of surfaces with different Cassie fractions were fabricated. For a given Cassie fraction surfaces had different pillar diameter and spacing combinations. Advancing and receding contact angles of both water and ethylene glycol were measured on the fabricated surfaces. We examined the effects of both surface feature size and Cassie fraction on advancing and receding contact angles and found no relationship between size and contact angle when Cassie fraction was held constant. Also examined was the effect of the Cassie fraction on contact angle hysteresis, which led to the development of a new theoretical framework for understanding contact angle hysteresis on rough surfaces that helps unite previous theory and observations with current observations. The theoretical framework includes empirically determined contact-line pinning forces. From measurements, we found a constant contact-line pinning force for the receding contact angles. For the advancing contact angles, there was also a contact-line pinning force, but one that changed with changing Cassie fraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it