MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327215975 · doi:10.1061/9780784412848.136

Wind Loads on Solar Collectors and PV Panels on Roofs

2013· article· en· W2327215975 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ted Stathopoulos, Eleni Xypnitou, Ioannis Zisis

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoofRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemWind tunnelWind engineeringSolar energyWind powerEngineeringPhotovoltaicsMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceArchitectural engineeringCivil engineeringStructural engineeringAerospace engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increased interest on renewable energy resources had a direct effect on the use of solar collectors and photovoltaics (PV) on residential and other structures. Current building codes and design standards offer little assistance to the designers regarding provisions for wind-induced loading. The scope of this paper is to address the wind-induced loads applied on particular rooftop energy structures. Findings from a study that was carried out in the boundary layer wind tunnel of Concordia University, Montreal are presented. For this study, a 1:200 geometric scale flat roof low-rise building was constructed and instrumented. The building model was equipped with three identical solar panels, which had six pressure taps on each surface. Several configurations were examined by changing the position of the panels on the roof as well as their inclination. The paper presents detailed results from the various configurations and discusses the effect of panel location and inclination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2013Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207