SEQUENTIAL CENTRAL RETINAL VEIN AND OPHTHALMIC ARTERY OCCLUSIONS IN A PEDIATRIC CASE OF PRIMARY ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID SYNDROME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Purpose: To report a case of sequential central retinal vein occlusion and ophthalmic artery occlusion in a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Methods: Observational case report. Color fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography were used to document the progression of a central retinal vein occlusion and sequential development of an ophthalmic artery occlusion within a 1-week period in a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. Results: A 15-year-old boy presented with unilateral blurry vision due to a central retinal vein occlusion along with other systemic symptoms. Within a 1-week period, he developed an ophthalmic artery occlusion in the same eye, with resulting bare light perception vision. Extensive evaluation by the pediatrics and rheumatology services led to a diagnosis of primary antiphospholipid syndrome as the etiology for the occlusions. Conclusion: This case report illustrates the rapid sequential venous and arterial ocular thrombosis in a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome. The authors present a case of unilateral consecutive central retinal vein occlusion and ophthalmic artery occlusion in a patient with primary antiphospholipid syndrome despite immunosuppression and anticoagulation therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".