A urea channel from <i>Bacillus cereus</i> reveals a novel hexameric structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urea is exploited as a nitrogen source by bacteria, and its breakdown products, ammonia and bicarbonate, are employed to counteract stomach acidity in pathogens such as Helicobacter pylori. Uptake in the latter is mediated by UreI, a UAC (urea amide channel) family member. In the present paper, we describe the structure and function of UACBc, a homologue from Bacillus cereus. The purified channel was found to be permeable not only to urea, but also to other small amides. CD and IR spectroscopy revealed a structure comprising mainly α-helices, oriented approximately perpendicular to the membrane. Consistent with this finding, site-directed fluorescent labelling indicated the presence of seven TM (transmembrane) helices, with a cytoplasmic C-terminus. In detergent, UACBc exists largely as a hexamer, as demonstrated by both cross-linking and size-exclusion chromatography. A 9 Å (1 Å=0.1 nm) resolution projection map obtained by cryo-electron microscopy of two-dimensional crystals shows that the six protomers are arranged in a planar hexameric ring. Each exhibits six density features attributable to TM helices, surrounding a putative central channel, while an additional helix is peripherally located. Bioinformatic analyses allowed individual TM regions to be tentatively assigned to the density features, with the resultant model enabling identification of residues likely to contribute to channel function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".