Study on the Transesterification of Methyl Aryl Phosphorothioates in Methanol Promoted by Cd(II), Mn(II), and a Synthetic Pd(II) Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Methanol solutions containing Cd(II), Mn(II), and a palladacycle, (dimethanol bis(N,N-dimethylbenzylamine-2C,N)palladium(II) (3), are shown to promote the methanolytic transesterification of O-methyl O-4-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate (2b) at 25 °C with impressive rate accelerations of 10(6)-10(11) over the background methoxide promoted reaction. A detailed mechanistic investigation of the methanolytic cleavage of 2a-d having various leaving group aryl substitutions, and particularly the 4-nitrophenyl derivative (2b), catalyzed by Pd-complex 3 is presented. Plots of k(obs) versus palladacycle [3] demonstrate strong saturation binding to form 2b:3. Numerical fits of the kinetic data to a universal binding equation provide binding constants, K(b), and first order catalytic rate constants for the methanolysis reaction of the 2b:3 complex (k(cat)) which, when corrected for buffer effects, give corrected (k(cat)(corr)) rate constants. A sigmoidal shaped plot of log(k(cat)(corr)) versus (s)(s)pH (in methanol) for the cleavage of 2b displays a broad (s)(s)pH independent region from 5.6 ≤ (s)(s)pH ≤ 10 with a k(minimum) = (1.45 ± 0.24) × 10(-2) s(-1) and a [lyoxide] dependent wing plateauing above a kinetically determined (s)(s)pK(a) of 12.71 ± 0.17 to give a k(maximum) = 7.1 ± 1.7 s(-1). Brønsted plots were constructed for reaction of 2a-d at (s)(s)pH 8.7 and 14.1, corresponding to reaction in the midpoints of the low and high (s)(s)pH plateaus. The Brønsted coefficients (β(LG)) are computed as -0.01 ± 0.03 and -0.86 ± 0.004 at low and high (s)(s)pH, respectively. In the low (s)(s)pH plateau, and under conditions of saturating 3, a solvent deuterium kinetic isotope effect of k(H)/k(D) = 1.17 ± 0.08 is observed; activation parameters (ΔH(Pd)(++) = 14.0 ± 0.6 kcal/mol and ΔS(Pd)(++)= -20 ± 2 cal/mol·K) were obtained for the 3-catalyzed cleavage reaction of 2b. Possible mechanisms are discussed for the reactions catalyzed by 3 at low and high sspH. This catalytic system is shown to promote the methanolytic cleavage of O,O-dimethyl phosphorothioate in CD3OD, producing (CD3O)2P═O(S(-)) with a half time for reaction of 34 min.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".