MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327332411 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.89.017303

High-spin states in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Te</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>124</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2014· article· lv· W2327332411 on OpenAlexaff
Ν. Fotiades, J. A. Cizewski, R. Krücken, R. M. Clark, P. Fallon, I. Y. Lee, A. O. Macchiavelli, W. Younes

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review C · 2014
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsYrastPhysicsOblate spheroidGammasphereAtomic physicsSpectroscopyIsotopeEnergy (signal processing)Spin statesState (computer science)CrystallographyNuclear physicsExcited stateQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In even-mass Te isotopes with $114\ensuremath{\le}A\ensuremath{\le}122$ the experimentally observed yrast ${I}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={16}^{+}$ states have been interpreted as favored noncollective oblate states based on the fully aligned $\ensuremath{\pi}{[{({g}_{7/2})}^{2}]}_{{6}^{+}}\ensuremath{\bigotimes}\ensuremath{\nu}{[{({h}_{11/2})}^{2}]}_{{10}^{+}}$ configuration. For $^{124}\mathrm{Te}$ the highest-spin positive-parity state known has ${I}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={10}^{+}$. An extension of the yrast cascade of $^{124}\mathrm{Te}$ is needed to spin at least 16${}^{+}$ in order to answer the question of whether this noncollective oblate state lies along the yrast line in this isotope. The level structure of $^{124}\mathrm{Te}$ has been studied via prompt $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray spectroscopy. $^{124}\mathrm{Te}$ was produced in the fission of the compound systems formed in two heavy-ion-induced reactions, $^{24}\mathrm{Mg}$ (134.5 MeV) + $^{173}\mathrm{Yb}$ and $^{23}\mathrm{Na}$ (129 MeV) + $^{176}\mathrm{Yb}$. $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray spectroscopy was accomplished with the Gammasphere array. The yrast cascade of $^{124}\mathrm{Te}$ was extended up to 5481-keV excitation energy with a tentative 16${}^{+}$ assignment for the highest observed state. This state does not exhibit the characteristics of the favored noncollective oblate states with ${I}^{\ensuremath{\pi}}={16}^{+}$ observed in the lighter doubly even Te isotopes, indicating that such a state is probably no longer yrast in $^{124}\mathrm{Te}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.242

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0720.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207