Analysis of the Putative Cr–Cr Quintuple Bond in Ar′CrCrAr′ (Ar′ = C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-Pr<sup>i</sup><sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>Based on the Combined Natural Orbitals for Chemical Valence and Extended Transition State Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nature of the putative Cr-Cr quintuple bond in Ar'CrCrAr' (Ar' = C(6)H(3)-2,6(C(6)H(3)-2,6-Pr(i)(2))(2)) is investigated with the help of a newly developed energy and density decomposition scheme. The new approach combines the extended transition state (ETS) energy decomposition method with the natural orbitals for chemical valence (NOCV) density decomposition scheme within the same theoretical framework. The results show that in addition to the five bonding components (σ(2)π(2)π'(2)δ(2)δ'(2)) of the Cr-Cr bond, the quintuple bond is augmented by secondary Cr-C interactions involving the Cr-ipso-carbon of the flanking aryl rings. The presence of isopropyl groups (Pr(i)) is further shown to stabilize Ar'CrCrAr' by 20 kcal/mol compared to the two Ar'Cr monomers through stabilizing van der Waals dispersion interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".