MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327392087 · doi:10.1097/bsd.0b013e31820bb0a9

Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures by Means of Anterior Fusion and Cage

2011· article· en· W2327392087 on OpenAlexaff
Bassam Zahra, Alain Jodoin, Gilles Maurais, Stefan Parent, Jean‐Marc Mac‐Thiong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorpectomyMedicineBurst fractureKyphosisSurgeryCobb angleSpinal fusionRadiographyDecompression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of treating acute thoracolumbar burst fractures using anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with a mesh cage and instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is increasing interest in using an anterior mesh cage with instrumentation after corpectomy for burst fractures. However, there is only limited information on this technique in the literature. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (mean age 37.6 y old) that had sustained a thoracolumbar burst fracture were included in this study. On admission, 20 patients (90.9%) had an incomplete neurological deficit. An anterior thoracolumbar approach was used to perform anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with a mesh cage and lateral fixation with screws and dual rods. We studied the operation date and delayed the blood loss, and we used the American Spinal Injury Association grade to evaluate the neurological status before surgery and in the follow-up period. Local kyphosis measured by the Cobb method was compared before and after the surgery using Wilcoxon signed-rank test/2-tailed test for analysis. RESULTS: Ninety percent of patients were operated within 2 days after admission and all were followed for a minimum of 25 months. The mean follow-up period was 47.4 months (range, 25 to 71 mo). Blood loss averaged 1445 mL. Of the 20 patients with incomplete neurological lesions, there were 6 (30%) patients with an improvement of at least 1 American Spinal Injury Association grade. No neurological deterioration was observed in any case. The local kyphosis measured by the Cobb method was improved from a mean of 15 degrees preoperative to a mean of 9.6 degrees in early postoperative period (P=0.002). The mean after 2 years was 11.5 degrees (P=0.011). There was no instrumentation failure. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior thoracolumbar decompression and fusion secured with an anterior mesh cage and instrumentation in thoracolumbar burst fractures provided excellent immediate reduction of post-traumatic local kyphosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spinal Disorders & TechniquesSame topicSpinal Fractures and Fixation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207