MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327401714 · doi:10.1097/mjt.0000000000000097

Acute Mastoiditis Before Pneumococcal Vaccination: The Experience of a Large Tertiary Care Pediatric Hospital

2014· article· en· W2327401714 on OpenAlexaff
Miguel Glatstein, Sharon Morag, Dennis Scolnik, Arik Alper, Shimon Reif, Galia Grisaru‐Soen

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Therapeutics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEar Surgery and Otitis Media
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStreptococcus pneumoniaePenicillinPediatricsTertiary carePneumococcal conjugate vaccinePneumococcal infectionsPneumoniaRetrospective cohort studyPneumococcal vaccinationMastoiditisAntibiotic resistanceVaccinationPneumococcal vaccineAntibioticsPneumococcal pneumoniaInternal medicineSurgeryImmunologyOtitisMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To report the experience of a large tertiary care pediatric center during a period of increasing Streptococcus pneumoniae antimicrobial resistance before the introduction of pneumococcal vaccine in Israel. Retrospective chart review of children diagnosed acute mastoiditis (AM) between January 1997 and December 2007. The children were divided into 4 age groups (6-11, 12-23, 24-35, and 36-40 months), and each group was compared with the others. A total of 198 AM episodes were recorded during the 10-year study period. The most prevalent pathogen was S. pneumonia, with a very low (15%) penicillin resistance rate (minimal inhibitory concentration ≥ 2). Complications were more prevalent in the 12- to 23-month age group. The number of AM cases increased during the study period. Penicillin resistance did not play an important role in determining the morbidity before the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.322

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TherapeuticsSame topicEar Surgery and Otitis MediaFrench-language works237,207