MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327444985 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100005424

Convergence Paralysis as a Manifestation of Polyarteritis Nodosa

2006· article· en· W2327444985 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jessica Wylie, Craig Campbell, Janet Pope, Jonathan Akikusa, Ronald M. Laxer, Dave Nicolle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLivedo reticularisPolyarteritis nodosaNecrotizing VasculitisVasculitisPolyneuropathyEncephalopathyPathologyInternal medicineGastroenterologyRheumatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a rare, systemic necrotizing vasculitis of medium-sized arteries. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of PAN includes at least three of: 1. weight loss < 4 kg, 2. livedo reticularis, 3. testicular pain or tenderness, 4. myalgias, weakness or leg tenderness, 5. mono-or polyneuropathy, 6. diastolic hypertension, 7. elevated blood creatinine or urea, 8. hepatitis B antigen or antibody in the serum, 9. aneurysms or occlusions of visceral arteries or 10. granulocytes on small or medium sized artery biopsy. Common sites of involvement include skin, joints, kidneys, gastrointestinal tract and peripheral nerves. Central nervous system involvement has been reported in up to 40% of cases; the usual manifestations are encephalopathy, focal deficits and seizures. Descriptions of PAN in the pediatric literature has been reported in fewer than 250 children.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207