MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327447899 · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000000106

A Novel Nonsense Mutation in the <i>EpCAM</i> Gene in a Patient With Congenital Tufting Enteropathy

2013· article· en· W2327447899 on OpenAlexaff
Cornelia Thoeni, Achiya Amir, Conghui Guo, S. Zhang, Yaron Avitzur, Y.M. Heng, Ernest Cutz, Aleixo M. Muise

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCeliac Disease Research and Management
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpithelial cell adhesion moleculeNonsense mutationMedicineMutationImmunohistochemistryEnteropathyDiarrheaPathologyCell adhesion moleculeImmunologyMissense mutationBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Tufting enteropathy (TE) is a classical congenital disorder of the intestinal mucosa causing protracted diarrhea in infancy as a result of a dysfunctional epithelial cell barrier, which is mainly caused by mutations in the EpCAM gene and expression of a nonfunctional epithelial cell adhesion molecule in the intestine. We report here a novel nonsense mutation in a patient suspected of having TE, resulting in a complete absence of EpCAM in duodenal enterocytes. METHODS: A patient presenting with congenital diarrhea and suspected of having TE was screened for EpCAM mutations, and duodenal biopsies were stained for EpCAM using immunohistochemistry analysis. RESULTS: We identified a novel homozygous nonsense mutation in the EpCAM gene in a patient suspected of having TE, causing a complete loss of EpCAM expression in duodenal enterocytes. CONCLUSIONS: With screening analysis for EpCAM mutations and immunohistochemistry for EpCAM expression in duodenal enterocytes, we found a novel homozygous mutation in a patient with classical protracted diarrhea in infancy finally diagnosed as TE, which results in a complete absence of EpCAM and in dysfunctional barrier formation in duodenal enterocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionSame topicCeliac Disease Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207