PRD-1, a Component of the Circadian System of <i>Neurospora crassa</i> , Is a Member of the DEAD-box RNA Helicase Family
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The circadian rhythms found in almost all organisms are driven by molecular oscillators, including transcription/translation feedback loops (TTFLs). However, TTFL-independent oscillators can drive rhythms in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The fungus Neurospora crassa is a model organism for studying the molecular mechanism of the circadian clock. Although a circadian TTFL involving the proteins FRQ, WC-1, and WC-2 is well-characterized in N. crassa, rhythms can still be observed in the absence of this feedback loop. These rhythms are said to be driven by 1 or more FRQ-less oscillator(s) (FLOs). The prd-1 mutation lengthens the period in frq wild type and was previously shown to severely disrupt FRQ-less rhythms in frq null mutants under several different conditions; therefore, the prd-1 gene product is a candidate for a component of a FLO. We report here that prd-1 also disrupts free-running rhythms in wc-1 null mutants, confirming its effects on FRQ-less rhythms. We have now mapped and identified the prd-1 gene as NCU07839, a DEAD-box RNA helicase dbp-2 Complementation with the wild-type gene corrects the rhythm defects of the prd-1 mutant in the complete circadian system (when the FRQ-based TTFL is intact) and also the free-running FRQ-less rhythm on low choline. A PRD-1-GFP fusion protein localizes to the nucleus. The prd-1 mutant has a single base pair change in the first base of an intron that results in abnormally spliced transcripts. FRQ-less rhythms on low choline, or entrained to heat pulses, were only marginally affected in strains carrying deletions of 2 other RNA helicases (prd-6 and msp-8). We conclude that PRD-1 is a member of an RNA helicase family that may be specifically involved in regulating rhythmicity in N. crassa in both the complete circadian system and FLO(s).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".