Carinal resection and reconstruction for tracheal bifurcation trauma with a widespread destruction of carinal cartilage; a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
症例は29歳, 男性. トラック運転中に居眠りをして大型トラックに追突, ハンドルで前胸部を強打した. 近医に搬送され気管分岐部裂傷の診断を得て, 当科に紹介された.気管支鏡検査上, 気管分岐部竜骨の左右主気管支接合部が損傷し直径約8mmの裂孔が認められた.受傷約24時間後に手術を開始.竜骨の損傷が比較的広範なため, 明らかな損傷部のみのdebridementと単純縫合閉鎖では術後縫合不全や肉芽性狭窄の危険性が高いと考え, 気管分岐部を切除しMontage型再建術を行った.術後, 気管・気管支吻合部合併症をきたすことなく良好に経過し第29病日に退院した.気管分岐部損傷に対する分岐部切除再建術の報告はこれまでないが, 竜骨の広範な破壊を伴う症例に対しては, 積極的にこの術式を考慮してよいと考える.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".