MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327519634 · doi:10.1190/segam2013-1014.1

Monogenic signal decomposition: A new approach to enhance magnetic data

2013· article· en· W2327519634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hassan H. Hassan, Rao Yalamanchili

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)GeologyMagnetic anomalyDecompositionSedimentary rockNoise (video)Orientation (vector space)Magnetic surveyComputer scienceGeophysicsMineralogyRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)PaleontologyMathematicsChemistryGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The magnetic method is well-known as one of the most powerful tools used to map concealed geological structures especially those associated with magnetic crystalline basements. Crystalline basements play an important role for oil and gas exploration in sedimentary basins because they influence the geology of the overlying sedimentary rocks and subsequently the formation of their oil and gas plays. Magnetic data from sedimentary structures are in general characterized by their low susceptibility contrast and poor signal-to-noise ratio and it is often challenging to extract subtle geological features from these data. Therefore, image enhancement techniques are very vital for extracting optimum geological and structural information from magnetic data. In this abstract, a new magnetic image enhancement approach is proposed. This approach is based on a recently developed digital processing technique known as monogenic signal decomposition. This new technique is able to decompose 2D magnetic signals into three primary attributes (amplitude, phase and orientation) and two secondary attributes (directional Hilbert and Riesz transforms). Although many magnetic attributes have been utilized to map subtle geologic features, these five particular attributes appear to add more valuable information to magnetic data interpretation. The aim of this study is therefore to explore the monogenic signal decomposition approach as an alternative technique to extract geological and structural information from magnetic data. This abstract describes the rotation-invariant monogenic signal decomposition and demonstrates its use in enhancing magnetic data. The monogenic signal decomposition technique was first tested on the total magnetic intensity (TMI) grid of a synthetic magnetic data and after obtaining satisfactory results the technique was applied to field magnetic data. The synthetic magnetic data was derived from Bishop 3D magnetic model whereas the actual field data was derived from an aeromagnetic survey flown over the Peace River Arch structure of Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB). The results obtained from the synthetic and field data indicate that the proposed approach has excellent performance in extracting structural features especially geological boundaries, faults and fractures from the data. Furthermore, it appears that this new approach is superior in enhancing structural features in aeromagnetic data than conventional enhancing techniques such as the horizontal and total gradient methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207