MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327520134 · doi:10.1515/zkri-2013-1697

Crystal-chemical investigation of Al 2(PO 4)(OH) 3augelite from Rapid Creek, Yukon, Canada

2014· article· de· W2327520134 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Francesco Capitelli, Michele Saviano, Maria Rosaria Ghiara, Manuela Rossi

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsEMPAOctahedronChemistryCrystallographyInfrared spectroscopyCrystal structureHydrogen bondSpectroscopyCationic polymerizationSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)StereochemistryMoleculeMineralogyElectron microprobeOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The structural characterization of Al 2 (PO 4 )(OH) 3 augelite, a natural orthophosphate coming from Rapid Creek, Yukon, Canada, was carried out by means of a multi-methodological approach based on WDS-EMPA chemical analysis, single crystal X-ray diffraction, and infrared spectroscopy. The structure was solved in the C 2 /m monoclinic space group, with the following unit cell constants: a = 13.0740(10), b = 7.9690(7), c = 5.0910(7) Å, β = 112.282(5)°, V = 490.81(9) Å 3 . Phosphorus atoms display tetrahedral (PO 4 ) coordination, while aluminum cations display octahedral and unusual five-fold coordination. The framework of the mineral can be viewed as the repetition of cationic arrays made up by AlO 6 /AlO 5 polyhedra, bridged by PO 4 groups, and further joined by O–H···O hydrogen bonds: such interactions were also correlated to IR spectroscopy analysis, by means of Libo­witzky formula applied on OH stretching vibrations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline MaterialsSame topicChemical Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207