A Spectrum of Ideas about Kierkegaard and the Overcoming of Violence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The three papers that follow are based on drafts prepared for the conference theme “Kierkegaard and the Overcoming of Violence” at Brock University, September 2011. Selected from fifteen, each is a spectrum of ideas on the theme, and together they reflect the range of intellectual concerns that are raised in discussions outside technical seminars and meetings of learned societies. They related to one or more of four categories: philosophy, religion, theology, and anthropology. Don Johnstone, Sacrificing Isaac: A Conclusion Different from Kierkegaard's, Don Johnstone is a longstanding member of the Brock University Philosophy Society, St. Catharines, Ontario. Marko Zlomislić, Crossing out the Crucifix, Marko Zlomislić is professor of Philosophy, Conestoga College, Kitchener, Canada. John R. Mayer, Repetition and Overcoming Violence with the Compassion of Nothingness, John R. Mayer is professor emeritus of philosophy at Brock University, St. Catharines, Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".