MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W23276160

Rationale for maintenance of the M184v resistance mutation in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase in treatment experienced patients.

2004· article· en· W23276160 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Turner, Bluma Brenner, Jean‐Pierre Routy, Marco Petrella, Mark A. Wainberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance mutationReverse transcriptaseVirologyMutationBiologyDrug resistanceVirusPrimer (cosmetics)In vivoViral replicationNucleotidyltransferaseImmunologyGeneticsChemistryRNA
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The M184V substitution in HIV-1 RT develops rapidly following initiation of therapy with 3TC and confers high-level phenotypic resistance to this drug both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, the presence of M184V is also associated with alteration of several mechanisms relating to RT function that include decreased RTprocessivity, reduced nucleotide-dependent primer unblocking, increased fidelity, hypersensitization to other NRTIs, impaired viral fitness, and delayed appearance of mutations in RT that are responsible for resistance to thymidine analogues (i.e. thymidine-associated mutations or TAMs). In addition, M184V may affect viral transmission and immunological response. Collectively, these factors might explain the residual antiviral effect and clinical benefit observed with continued use of 3TC in combination therapy regimens following the emergence of M184V.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicHIV Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207