MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327654445 · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181fad4c2

Discussion: A New, Validated Instrument to Evaluate Competency in Microsurgery: The University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment Instrument [Outcomes Article]

2011· letter· en· W2327654445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Steven J. Kasten, Kevin C. Chung

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2011
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesAmerican Educational Research Association
KeywordsMicrosurgerySection (typography)Medical educationLibrary scienceMedicinePsychologySurgeryBusinessComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ann Arbor, Mich. From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System. Received for publication July 21, 2010; accepted July 23, 2010. Disclosure:The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this Discussion or of the article being discussed. Steven J. Kasten, M.D.; Section of Plastic Surgery; The University of Michigan Health System; 1500 East Medical Center Drive; 2130 Taubman Center; Ann Arbor, Mich. 48109-0340; [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207