MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327679155 · doi:10.1002/fuce.201600002

Is Fine‐Grained Simulation Able to Propose New Polyelectrolyte Membranes?

2016· article· en· W2327679155 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandre Fleury, François Godey, Patrick Laflamme, Aziz Ghoufi, Armand Soldera

Bibliographic record

VenueFuel Cells · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsNafionMembraneProton exchange membrane fuel cellPolyelectrolyteMolecular dynamicsMoleculeMonomerIonomerPolymerChemical engineeringConductivityMaterials scienceProton transportGlass transitionPlasticizerChemical physicsProtonSulfurNanotechnologyChemistryComputational chemistryOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryComposite materialPhysicsCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An extensive understanding in the molecular motions that occur in Nafion® should lead to important development of improved proton exchange membrane for use in fuel cells (PEMFC). As water molecules are added in the system, changes within the Nafion® chain definitely take place. To visualize such a process, molecular dynamics is especially useful. Can information gained at this level of details be useful to propose new molecules, with ultimately better physical properties, such as higher proton conductivity? For this purpose, we first computed non‐bond parameters stemming from the study of the trifluorosufonic acid. They are inserted in the pcff force field. We then applied the procedure developed in our lab to extract the glass transition temperature of Nafion® with different water uptakes. The plasticization effect is first confirmed, fostering a molecular analysis. The particular behavior of the sulfur‐sulfur distance is revealed, guiding the design of new monomers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuel CellsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207