Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary: The reproduction process in angiosperms is extremely complicated, compared with that of animals. All theprocess, from gametogenesis to fertilization moment, gradually takes place within crowded gametophytic tissues(pollenand embryo sac). From such a condition above, nothing has been known about gamete interaction moment and relatedmolecular factors, so far. Recently, I succeeded in identifying a novel transmembrane protein GCS1(CENERATIVEC ELL SPECIFIC1), expressed exclusively in male gametes, using generative cells isolated from Lilium longiflorumpollen. In GCS 1 function analyses based on an Arabidopsis GCS1mutant line, GCS1was found to be an importantfa ctor necessary to gamete attachment and fusion. Besides, it was found that GCS1homologues are conserved in slimemolds, algae and parasites, suggesting that they are related not only to angiosperm reproduction, but also to eukaryoticmating, widely. This finding must be an important clue to understanding the angiosperm fertilization moment that hadnot given any molecular biological knowledge, and may greatly contribute to clarification of basic mechanisms in thesexual reproduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".