Uniform strain fields inside multiple inclusions in an elastic infinite plane under anti-plane shear
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper constructs multiple elastic inclusions with prescribed uniform internal strain fields embedded in an infinite matrix under given uniform remote anti-plane shear. The method used is based on the sufficient and necessary conditions imposed on the boundary values of a holomorphic function, which guarantee the existence of the holomorphic function in a multiply connected region. The unknown shape of each of the multiple inclusions is characterized by a polynomial conformal mapping with a finite number of unknown coefficients. With the aid of Cauchy’s integral formula and Faber series, these unknown coefficients are determined by a system of nonlinear equations. Detailed numerical examples are shown for multiple inclusions with various prescribed uniform internal strain fields, for symmetrical inclusions and for inclusions whose shapes are independent of the remote loading, respectively. It is found that the admissible range of uniform internal strain fields for multiple inclusions is moderately larger than the admissible range of the uniform internal strain field for a single elliptical inclusion under the same remote loading. In particular, specific conditions on the prescribed uniform internal strain fields and elastic constants of the multiple inclusions are derived for the existence of symmetric inclusions and rotationally symmetrical inclusions. Moreover, for any two inclusions among multiple inclusions of shapes independent of the remote loading, it is shown that the ratio between the uniform internal strain fields inside the two inclusions equals a specific ratio determined by the shear moduli of the two inclusions and the matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".