MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327825018 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-8021

A Reconfigurable Robot with Telescopic Links for In-Space Servicing

2010· article· en· W2327825018 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
Canadian institutionsCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorKinematicsRobotRobot end effectorParallel manipulatorMechanism (biology)BrakeComputer scienceControl engineeringTrajectoryControl theory (sociology)SimulationEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compacting the arms of a space manipulator in its designated launch volume has been a difficult design problem in several robotic missions not only for in-orbit servicing but also for planetary exploration. This paper presents a conceptual design for space manipulators with lockable telescopic links that allows the arms to change their length as well as the twist angles. Each cylindrical telescopic link is equipped with a built-in brake mechanism which is normally locked, but the lock can be released whenever the kinematic parameters are to be changed. Since the telescopic links do not have any actuator, the robot reduces its number of degrees of freedom by constraining the motion of its end-effector in order to be able to control the values of the length and the twist angles. The control system which autonomously realizes the configuration change in addition to autonomous calibration of the manipulator after every configuration change are fully developed in this work. Several space mission examples which can benefit from such a reconfigurable robot are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.710

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it