MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2327893620 · doi:10.1115/detc2011-47410

Feature Sensitive Mesh Reconstruction by Normal Vector Cone Filtering

2011· article· en· W2327893620 on OpenAlexafffund
Ji Ma, Hsi-Yung Feng, Lihui Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPoint cloudPolygon meshComputer scienceNormalT-verticesMesh generationTriangle meshAlgorithmSurface reconstructionLaplacian smoothingFeature (linguistics)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometrySurface (topology)Computer graphics (images)Finite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic and reliable reconstruction of sharp features remains an open research issue in triangle mesh surface reconstruction. This paper presents a new feature sensitive mesh reconstruction method based on dependable neighborhood geometric information per input point. Such information is derived from the matching result of the local umbrella mesh constructed at each point. The proposed algorithm is different from the existing post-processing algorithms. The proposed algorithm reconstructs the triangle mesh via an integrated and progressive reconstruction process and features a unified multi-level inheritance priority queuing mechanism to prioritize the inclusion of each candidate triangle. A novel flatness sensitive filter, referred to as the normal vector cone filter, is introduced in this work and used to reliably reconstruct sharp features. In addition, the proposed algorithm aims to reconstruct a watertight manifold triangle mesh that passes through the complete original point set without point addition and removal. The algorithm has been implemented and validated using publicly available point cloud data sets. Compared to the original object geometry, it is seen that the reconstructed triangle meshes preserve the sharp features well and only contain minor shape deviations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.351

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topic3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207