Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe the clinical features, predisposing factors, and management of 8 new cases of spontaneous globe subluxation (SGS) and provide a review of the relevant literature. DESIGN: Patient demographics, clinical presentations, investigations, management, complications, and outcomes were measured. METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-note analysis of 8 patients with SGS and a major review of the English-language literature. RESULTS: Eight new cases of spontaneous globe subluxation were identified with varying clinical manifestations and treatments. Literature review has shown less than 50 cases. Space-occupying lesions such as thyroid eye disease, shallow orbits, and floppy eyelids were major contributors to predisposition to SGS. CONCLUSIONS: Orbital congestion, shallow orbits, and floppy eyelids can all play a role in predisposing patients to SGS. Successful surgical management of SGS, when required, should be tailored to the individual patient profile for best results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it