Exact Solution for Search-and-Rescue Path Planning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discrete search and rescue path planning is known to be hard, and problem-solving techniques proposed so far mainly fail to properly assess optimality gap for practical size problems. A new mixed-integer linear programming (MIP) formulation is proposed to optimally solve the single agent discrete search and rescue (SAR) path planning problem. The approach lies on a compact open-loop SAR with anticipated feedback problem model to efficiently maximize cumulative probability of success in detecting a target. Anticipated feedback information resulting from possible observations outcomes along the path is exploited to update target occupancy beliefs. A network representation is utilized to simplify modeling, facilitate constraint specification and speed-up problem-solving. The proposed MIP approach rapidly yields optimal solutions for realistic problems using parallel processing CPLEX technology, while providing for the first time a robust upper bound on solution quality through Lagrangean integrality constraint relaxation. Fast computation naturally allows extending open-loop modeling to a closed-loop environment to progressively integrate real-time action outcomes as they occur on a rolling time horizon. Comparative performance results clearly show the value of the approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it