MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2328013292 · doi:10.1139/cjm-2012-0519

Role of the Vps9-domain protein RgfA in<i>Dictyostelium</i>chemotaxis and development

2012· article· en· W2328013292 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jeffrey A. Hadwiger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsChemotaxisDictyosteliumBiologyDictyostelium discoideumCell biologyPinocytosisRabGeneGuanine nucleotide exchange factorGeneticsReceptorEndocytosisSignal transductionGTPase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proteins with a Vps9 domain function as guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rab proteins and can mediate the uptake of cell surface receptors or other molecules through endocytosis. However, genes encoding these proteins have not been previously studied in cells with robust chemotactic capabilities. Several genes encoding Vps9 domains were identified in the genome of Dictyostelium discoideum, and one of the genes, designated as rgfA (DDB_G0272038), was examined for functions in cell growth, development, and chemotaxis. The rgfA gene was expressed during vegetative growth and throughout development, but disruption of this gene resulted in no major alterations in cell growth, macropinocytosis, developmental morphology, or chemotactic movement. However, heterologous expression of RgfA resulted in a delay of developmental morphogenesis and impaired chemotaxis of cells to folate but did not affect macropinocytosis. These results suggest that RgfA might share redundant functions with other Dictyostelium Vps9-domain proteins and that heterologous expression of this protein can alter processes that depend on the reception of external signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207