Endurance exercise attenuates cardiotoxicity induced by androgen deprivation and doxorubicin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is associated with cardiac dysfunction and irreversible testicular damage. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is administered prior to DOX treatment to preserve testicular function. However, ADT may exacerbate DOX-induced cardiac dysfunction. Exercise is cardioprotective, but the effects of exercise on cardiac function during combined ADT and DOX treatment are currently unknown. In this study, male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to experimental groups: control (CON), ADT, DOX, or ADT+DOX. Animals received ADT or control implants on days 1 and 29 of the 56-day protocol. Animals remained sedentary (SED) or engaged in treadmill endurance exercise (TM) beginning on day 1. On day 15, the animals received DOX at 1 mg·(kg body mass)(-1)·d(-1) by intraperitoneal injection for 10 consecutive days, or an equivalent volume of saline. On day 57, cardiac function was assessed in vivo and ex vivo. Animals treated with DOX alone, or with combined ADT+DOX, showed significant (P < 0.05) reductions in left ventricular developed pressure (-21% and -27%), maximal rate of pressure development (-29% and -32%), and maximal rate of pressure decline (25% and 31%), respectively when compared with the sedentary control animals. Endurance exercise training attenuated (P > 0.05) cardiac dysfunction associated with combined ADT+DOX treatment, indicating that exercise during simultaneous ADT+DOX treatment is cardioprotective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".